# Cursor transfer, retention and training review

Record what the selected Cursor feature and model do with code, and what the employer permits.

Dated provider-documentation categories with blank organisation decisions. No vendor storage or deletion test was performed.

Source: https://aona.ai/resources/guides/cursor-privacy-mode-company-code/
Sources checked: 2026-09-21

| Use case | Documented consideration | Your evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Local AI request | Code context can reach model providers | Record feature/model/recipient |
| Privacy Mode enabled | No-training commitment | Verify effective account/team setting |
| Model retention exception | Separate terms and approval | Record selected model policy |
| Cloud Agent | Repository environment and retained copies | Review conversation and snapshot lifecycle |

## Review checklist

- [ ] Name the actual model and feature
  Do not infer retention from the privacy setting alone.
- [ ] Verify the effective team policy
  Record whether the setting is centrally enforced and applicable to this client.
- [ ] Review retained copies and disclosure permission
  Separate provider storage terms from the employer’s approval to send code.

## Included example files

- README.md
- documented-categories.csv
- selected-configuration.json
- approval-note.md

## Source references

- Cursor: Privacy and Data Governance: https://cursor.com/docs/enterprise/privacy-and-data-governance (2026-09-21)
- Cursor: Security: https://cursor.com/security (2026-09-21)
- Cursor: Cloud Agent Secrets and Network: https://cursor.com/docs/cloud-agent/security-network (2026-09-21)

Use the worksheet within the relevant legal, contractual and technical scope. It is not a certification or a record of an installed-product test.
