30 días de prueba para evaluar sus riesgos de IAEmpezar ahora
Ir al contenido principal

MODELOS DE SEGURIDAD DE IA PROPIOS DE AONA

Conoce Orbital.

Aonamodelos y reglas propios para la seguridad de IA precisa y rentable.

for a full check on a laptop
<0.1 s
decisiones políticas correctas
96.6%
false personal-data alarms on business documents
0.4%
of memory on the device
563 MB
Measured by Aona against other models. See the results

Nuestra tecnología.
Tu ventaja de seguridad.

Orbital is Aona’s own security technology: purpose-built models, deterministic detectors and the evaluation work behind them. It powers sensitive-data recognition and policy checks inside Aona, with supported processing on employee machines, on-premises or in the cloud. Orbital 2 runs the whole check, Radar, Lens and Reflex, on a laptop in under a tenth of a second.

01

SEGURIDAD POR DISEÑO

Diseñado para seguridad.

Identifique datos sensibles y evalúe solicitudes contra sus políticas con modelos de seguridad propios de Aona y controles deterministas.

02

RENDIMIENTO

Precisión y velocidad.

Combine precise validation with focused models for efficient security checks. 96.6% correct policy decisions on held-out tests, y a full check in under 0.1 s on a laptop.

03

CONTROL DE DESPLIEGUE

Su infraestructura. Su control.

Ejecute controles Orbital soportados en máquinas de empleados, local o en la nube, alineado con sus requisitos de privacidad y despliegue.

SPEED

Fast enough to check
every prompt.

Orbital 2 reads the text once and answers every guardrail in the same pass. In the cloud one verdict comes back in 93 ms and a 37-guardrail framework in 0.73 s; on a laptop the full check takes under a tenth of a second, in a few hundred megabytes of memory.

Response time per request

Median, one request at a time. Lower is better.

In the cloudOrbital Cloud 2.2.9 on a T4 GPU, measured 9 October 2026

One verdict93 ms
Framework of 19 guardrails393 ms
Framework of 37 guardrails0.73 s

On a laptopApple M4, Reflex on the Mac GPU

Full check on one prompt<0.1 s
Framework of 8 guardrails390 ms
Framework of 37 guardrails1.5 s

~20 ms

Per guardrail in a full framework

37 guardrails in 0.73 s on Orbital Cloud, every one evaluated, because Reflex reads the text once y answers them all in the same pass.

How we measured speed

Medians, one request at a time, with the 95th percentile where it was measured. In the cloud every guardrail of every framework was evaluated. On the laptop, the full check was measured on the installed Orbital 2.2.9 agent and the framework timings on the same Orbital 2 Reflex model.

WhereMeasureMedianDetail
In the cloudOrbital Cloud 2.2.9 on a T4 GPU, measured 9 October 2026One verdictaverage-length prompt, 120 requests93 ms121 ms at p95
In the cloudOrbital Cloud 2.2.9 on a T4 GPU, measured 9 October 2026Framework of 19 guardrailsevery guardrail evaluated, 40 requests393 ms445 ms at p95
In the cloudOrbital Cloud 2.2.9 on a T4 GPU, measured 9 October 2026Framework of 37 guardrailsevery guardrail evaluated, 40 requests0.73 s777 ms at p95
On a laptopApple M4, Reflex on the Mac GPUFull check on one promptReflex, Lens y Radar together, 38 requests<0.1 smedians of 53 y 76 ms in two runs
On a laptopApple M4, Reflex on the Mac GPUFramework of 8 guardrailsone request reads the text once390 ms
On a laptopApple M4, Reflex on the Mac GPUFramework of 37 guardrailsone request reads the text once1.5 s

ACCURACY AGAINST OTHER GUARD MODELS

Decisiones de seguridad.
Medido, no asumido.

Aona scores Orbital y the alternatives on the same held-out prompts, with the same policy text. On both jobs Orbital is built for, deciding policy and finding personal data, it leads the purpose-built guard models and detectors we tested.

Policy guardrails

887 held-out prompts across 52 policies. 430 violations, 457 allowed requests.

Aona Orbital

Orbital 2.2.9Reflex, the Orbital 2 decision model96.6%857 of 887 correct

Purpose-built guard models

Granite Guardian 3.1 2BIBM, open weights80.5%714 of 887 correct
Llama Guard 3 1BMeta, open weights76.3%677 of 887 correct

Frontier general-purpose models, hosted API

Mistral-Large-3refused 30 prompts99%857 prompts scored
GPT-5.1refused 20 prompts97%867 prompts scored
DeepSeek-V3.2refused 30 prompts96%857 prompts scored
Always answer “allowed”Trivial floor51.5%887 prompts
Every model received the same written policy, in its own native policy slot. Orbital never saw these prompts in training; the other models judged them zero-shot.

Orbital decides policy like a frontier model, on the employee’s own machine. The hosted frontier models refused 20 to 30 prompts, mostly the encoded and injection attacks a guardrail exists to read, and were scored only on the rest. Orbital answered all 887.

How the policy comparison was run

Qué se midió

Accuracy is agreement with the reference decision: catch the violation, allow the benign request. A model that answered “allowed” every time would score 51.5%.

How the comparison was run

Aona ran Granite Guardian and Llama Guard on its own Tesla T4 GPU with each policy injected into the model’s native policy slot, so no model guessed a policy it was never given. Both answered all 887 prompts with no unparseable replies. Frontier models were called through their hosted APIs.

Which Orbital

Orbital 2.2.9 was scored on 9 October 2026 through the served gateway on Orbital Cloud. The same Reflex model on the Orbital Edge device runtime scored 96.2% (853 of 887). Competitor rows were measured in July 2026 on the same 887 prompts.

Alcance

Aona’s internal evaluation on Aona’s policy catalogue. Orbital was trained on this policy distribution with these prompts held out; the comparison models were not. Re-evaluate your own policies, languages y hardware before rollout.

Cómo se evalúa la precisión

Aona evalúa tanto detecciones fallidas como falsos positivos usando ejemplos etiquetados, negativos difíciles y pruebas retenidas. Para sus políticas, pruebe solicitudes permitidas y no permitidas en el modelo, idioma y despliegue previstos. Este es un enfoque de ingeniería para la precisión, no una promesa de detección perfecta ni una puntuación universal.

ORBITAL 2.2.9 ON HELD-OUT TESTS

Attacks, near misses y languages.

of attacks caught by the intent screen
99.0%
104 of 105 held-out attacks, 80 of them not in English
false alarms on near-miss requests
0.9%
1 of 108 benign look-alike requests
accuracy in English, French y Spanish
99.1%
2,802 held-out guardrail y intent rows
of data-leak y override probes caught
95.5%
191 of 200 held-out leak-critical probes

Source: Aona’s internal evaluation reports, July to October 2026. Orbital figures measured on Orbital 2.2.9; every competitor scored on the same held-out rows. Results on your own policies, languages and hardware will vary; test them before rollout.

PERSONAL DATA

Precise on identifiers.
Accurate in 12 languages.

Orbital against two widely used detectors, on the same held-out slices, scored by the same span scorer.

Structured identifiers, precision

1,000 held-out rows, higher is better

Aona Orbital 2.2.91.000
Microsoft Presidio0.896
GLiNER-PII0.387

False alarms on 403 look-alikes

lower is better

Aona Orbital 2.2.99 of 403
Microsoft Presidio96 of 403
GLiNER-PII242 of 403

Names, places y dates in 12 languages, F1

544 prompts, higher is better

Aona Orbital 2.2.90.936
Microsoft Presidio0.271
GLiNER-PII0.605

When Orbital reports an identifier, it is right: precision 1.000 on the structured slice. Radar validates checksums before it reports, so it raised 9 false alarms on 403 look-alike identifiers, against 96 for Presidio and 242 for GLiNER-PII, and Orbital finds names, places and dates across 12 languages at F1 0.936, more than three times Presidio’s 0.271.

How the personal-data comparison was run
SystemStructured identifiers, precision1,000 held-out rows, higher is betterFalse alarms on 403 look-alikeslower is betterNames, places y dates in 12 languages, F1544 prompts, higher is better
Aona Orbital 2.2.9Radar + Lens1.0009 of 4030.936
Microsoft Presidioopen source, regex y NER0.89696 of 4030.271
GLiNER-PIIgliner_multi_pii-v1, zero-shot NER0.387242 of 4030.605

Structured identifiers

1,000 held-out rows covering Australian TFN, Singapore NRIC, Spanish NIF, IBAN, crypto addresses, US SSN and ITIN, payment cards and JWTs. Each system was scored only on the identifier types it supports. Radar reports a bare 9-digit tax or social security number only when a keyword names it, which is what keeps its precision at 1.000.

Look-alikes y languages

403 adversarial negatives: strings shaped like identifiers that fail validation. 544 labelled prompts in 12 languages, scored on person, location and date, the families all three systems support. Presidio ran with its best configuration, including the AU and SG recognisers. Measured 9 October 2026 on Orbital 2.2.9; competitors re-run the same day.

EVERYDAY DOCUMENTS

Quiet on everyday documents.
1 of 240 flagged.

Aona measures false alarms as well as misses, because a detector that flags ordinary work gets in the way of it.

Orbital 2.2.9 · 240 business documents

1/240

0.4% falsely flagged

9 October 2026 · 240 business documents with no personal data, served gateway. Falsas alarmas son detecciones incorrectas de datos sensibles, no tasa general de alucinaciones.
Calidad de detección y condiciones de prueba

Measured 9 October 2026 on Orbital 2.2.9 through the served gateway: 1 of 240 ordinary business documents with no personal data (0.4%) raised a personal-data alarm on Orbital Cloud, and 2 of 240 (0.8%) on the Orbital Edge device bundle. On the same release, Radar and Lens found 93.6% of 1,845 labelled personal-data values across about 40 types, and scored F1 0.936 on names, places and dates in 12 languages.

EN EL DISPOSITIVO

The whole check, on the laptop.

With Orbital Edge the prompt is checked where it is typed. Sensitive data is redacted or the request is blocked before it leaves the device.

for a full check on a laptop
<0.1 s
Memory on the device
563 MB
First install
~1 GB
How we measured the footprint

Reflex, Lens y Radar on one prompt, on the device. Median 53 to 76 ms over 38 requests on an Apple M4.

Memory on the device. Agent plus Reflex on a 4-vCPU Linux laptop-class machine, y 509 MB on Windows. On a Mac, Activity Monitor read 354 MB on 6 October 2026.

First install. Installer y every model together: 1,053 MiB on macOS and 1,049 MiB on Windows.

Confirma la capacidad del dispositivo, la disponibilidad de la versión y las comprobaciones que soporta tu cliente.

DENTRO DE CADA MODELO

La comprobación correcta
Por la pregunta correcta.

Determinista donde la regla es exacta. Contextual donde el significado importa. Los identificadores estructurados necesitan validación. Los datos personales necesitan reconocimiento. Las políticas empresariales necesitan contexto. Orbital integra estas técnicas en un sistema de seguridad.

AONA ORBITAL RADAR

Secretos e identificadores tienen señales reconocibles.

Radar runs 111 deterministic detectors over 87 entity types: credentials and API keys, payment cards, bank details and national and tax identifiers from around 40 jurisdictions. It validates checksums before it reports, sees through invisible characters, look-alike letters and encoded text, and needs no model at all. Add company-specific patterns and allow or block term lists.

Measured against Microsoft Presidio

Precision 1.000 on structured identifiers · 9 false alarms on 403 look-alike identifiers, against 96 for Presidio y 242 for GLiNER-PII

Structured findings in milliseconds, without a model call

Protege identificadores empresariales, no solo datos personales.

Each detector has its own scope. A format match alone is not proof that a value is sensitive; validation is what removes the look-alikes.

All four Submodels at a glance
Radar
Radar runs 111 deterministic detectors over 87 entity types: credentials and API keys, payment cards, bank details and national and tax identifiers from around 40 jurisdictions. It validates checksums before it reports, sees through invisible characters, look-alike letters and encoded text, and needs no model at all. Add company-specific patterns and allow or block term lists. Each detector has its own scope. A format match alone is not proof that a value is sensitive; validation is what removes the look-alikes.
Lente
Lens is Aona’s own encoder model for personal information in free text: names, street addresses, cities, postcodes and dates that format checks can miss. It reads the whole prompt, in many languages, and hands every span to the redaction step with exact character positions. La detección depende del texto y del idioma soportado. Prueba los ejemplos que importan a tu organización.
Reflex
Reflex is the Orbital 2 decision model. It reads the request once and answers every configured guardrail, your own written policies included, with a calibrated yes or no, generating no text. That is why a whole framework of guardrails comes back in a fraction of a second on an ordinary laptop. Examples configure the check; they do not retrain a private model. Reflex decides; Radar y Lens provide the redaction spans. Validate the results on your own policies.
Vision · Preview
Vision is Aona’s own visual detector for handwritten signatures in images and document pages. It looks at the original pixels, page by page and in overlapping tiles, so a small signature is not lost, and on Orbital Edge the pixels never leave the device. Preview capability, not generally available. It does not identify the signer, authenticate a signature or prove consent.

PONER EN PRÁCTICA UNA POLÍTICA

La misma tarea de la IA.
Un resultado diferente.

Un empleado o agente envía una solicitud. Orbital comprueba los datos o la política dentro del alcance; el flujo de trabajo soportado decide si redactar, bloquear o continuar.

El modelo evalúa.
Un flujo de trabajo soportado aplica la decisión.
Prompt para empleados o agentes

Redactar seguimiento para Maya Patel en maya.patel@example.com sobre su cita.

Maya Patel · maya.patel@example.com

EJEMPLO · REDACT

Detalles personales encontrados

Gobierno

Eliminar identificadores personales

Redactar seguimiento para [PERSONA] en [EMAIL] sobre su cita.
Mantenga la tarea útil. Reemplace los detalles personales.
Ilustración completa. Respuesta de ejemplo: Redact. Keep the useful task. Replace the personal details.

EDGE OR CLOUD. YOUR REQUIREMENTS.

Choose where it runs.
Mantén tu póliza.

Orbital runs its own inference, without requiring a separate general-purpose AI service for each Orbital check. Orbital Edge y Orbital Cloud run the same model: you choose where the check runs.

EN EL DISPOSITIVO

Orbital Edge

The whole check, on the laptop.

Radar, Lens, Reflex y Vision run inside a local agent on the employee’s machine: about 1 GB to install, 563 MB of memory, and under 0.1 s for a full check on an Apple M4.

PIÉNSALO

When prompts should be checked where they are typed, with no round trip.

Confirma la capacidad del dispositivo, la disponibilidad de la versión y las comprobaciones que soporta tu cliente.

SERVER-SIDE

Orbital Cloud

The same model, on a GPU.

Orbital Cloud runs the same Reflex model on server infrastructure: 93 ms for a verdict y 0.73 s for a 37-guardrail framework on a T4 GPU, without loading anything on the endpoint.

PIÉNSALO

Cuando la inferencia debe usar recursos del servidor en lugar de la capacidad del endpoint.

Cloud nombra el Modelo, no es un destino obligatorio alojado por Aona. Confirma tu configuración.

Radar, Lens, Reflex and Vision are the same Submodels in Orbital Edge and Orbital Cloud, selected according to the configured check and available capabilities. Validate your workload, release and client support; hosting, compute and Aona service costs still apply.

CORRE ORBITAL DONDE ENCAJE

Tu infraestructura.
Orbitales inteligencia.

Lleva los cheques compatibles al equipo del empleado, a tus propios servidores o a la nube. La ubicación del procesamiento es una elección, no un requisito para enviar cada cheque a Aona.

Máquina de empleados

Ejecute controles soportados localmente usando recursos del dispositivo. Elija un modelo adecuado y valide cliente y hardware.

En las instalaciones

Ejecute procesamiento Orbital soportado en infraestructura operada por su organización, dentro de su entorno.

Cloud

Use su nube de cliente o servidores gestionados por Aona para procesamiento soportado. Dimensione la infraestructura para la carga.

TUS REGLAS, HECHAS PROBABLES

Del documento de política
a una barrera de seguridad funcional.

No necesitas reentrenar un modelo para cambiar una regla. Configura la política, aclárala con ejemplos y prueba el límite.

  1. 01

    Escribe la regla

    Describe what must not happen. Use a written policy for Reflex, or Radar patterns y term lists.

    EJEMPLO ILUSTRATIVO

    No divulgar una adquisición antes de la aprobación.

  2. 02

    Añade ejemplos

    Usa ejemplos etiquetados para aclarar qué debe y qué no debe activar la regla.

    EJEMPLO ILUSTRATIVO

    Anuncio no aprobado → conflicto de política.

  3. 03

    Prueba el límite

    Comprueba solicitudes permitidas y no permitidas por separado. Revisa hallazgos incorrectos antes del despliegue.

    EJEMPLO ILUSTRATIVO

    Resumen público aprobado → se espera que pase.

  4. 04

    Activa el control

    Aplica la política probada mediante un cliente Aona soportado o tu integración.

    EJEMPLO ILUSTRATIVO

    El cliente o integración soportada aplica la respuesta configurada.

Explora la aplicación de las políticas

EFICIENCIA POR DISEÑO

Utiliza el cómputo
la tarea necesita.

Una regla simple no debería requerir una llamada de IA de propósito general. Orbital Aona da un camino libre de modelo y su propia inferencia enfocada.

  1. 01

    Sin modelo para reglas exactas

    Patrones, listas de términos y validación de suma de verificación pueden ejecutarse sin inferencia de modelo aprendido.

  2. 02

    Modelos enfocados para contexto

    Configure los controles soportados para la tarea. No todas las solicitudes necesitan cada submodelo.

  3. 03

    Sin cargo API general de IA por control

    Orbital realiza su propia inferencia en su infraestructura seleccionada, sin alquilar un modelo general para cada control.

Diseñado para un gasto de inferencia menor. Los ahorros reales varían; los costes de computación, alojamiento y Aona servicio siguen aplicándose.

Qué significa esto para los costes operativos

Orbital ejecuta la inferencia de modelos propia de Aona en lugar de requerir una llamada API de IA general de pago para cada control Orbital. Los controles deterministas no necesitan inferencia de modelo; modelos enfocados manejan reconocimiento y contexto de política. Esta arquitectura reduce el gasto en inferencia. El ahorro real depende de la carga y despliegue; costos de computación, hosting y servicio Aona siguen aplicando.

MÁS ALLÁ DE UN SOLO CUADRO DE TEXTO

Documenta las comprobaciones.
Contexto de uso.

Dos trabajos diferentes alrededor del conjunto de barandillas. Uno incorpora el contenido de archivos a las comprobaciones; el otro describe el uso de IA.

CONTENIDO DEL DOCUMENTO

Las mismas comprobaciones, más allá del prompt.

Orbital Files prepares content from supported documents, including supported OCR paths, for configured data y policy checks. It is a processing pipeline, not a separate Model or Submodel.

File formats, OCR y original-byte access depend on the path. Vision’s signature detection, in preview, is a separate capability.

Explora la protección de archivos

ANÁLISIS DE CASOS DE USO · FASE DE PRUEBAS

Comprende el trabajo detrás de la solicitud.

Where enabled, Orbital’s separate use-case classification can identify activities such as email, research y software development. It describes AI usage; it does not determine the security verdict.

Registrado como capacidad en fase de pruebas con control de bandera, no disponible generalmente. Confirma la disponibilidad del despliegue antes de planificar un lanzamiento.

Explora análisis de adopción

UN VISTAZO MÁS DETALLADO

Buenas preguntas.
Límites claros.

Evalúa un flujo de trabajo real, no un nombre de modelo aislado.

¿Qué son los Modelos Orbital de Aona?

Orbital is Aona’s own security technology: purpose-built models, deterministic detectors and the evaluation work behind them. It powers sensitive-data recognition and policy checks inside Aona, with supported processing on employee machines, on-premises or in the cloud. Orbital 2 runs the whole check, Radar, Lens and Reflex, on a laptop in under a tenth of a second. Orbital Edge and Orbital Cloud are the Orbital Models, each built from the same four specialist Submodels: Radar, Lens, Reflex and Vision. Availability depends on the release and configuration.

¿Es Orbital otro asistente de IA para empleados?

El papel de Orbital aquí es la seguridad de IA: detectar datos sensibles y comprobar solicitudes contra políticas en rutas de uso soportadas para empleados y agentes. No es un reemplazo de las herramientas de IA que tu organización usa para escribir, investigar o programar.

¿Requieren las comprobaciones de Orbital una API de IA general separada?

Orbital ejecuta la inferencia de modelos propia de Aona en lugar de requerir una llamada API de IA general de pago para cada control Orbital. Los controles deterministas no necesitan inferencia de modelo; modelos enfocados manejan reconocimiento y contexto de política. Esta arquitectura reduce el gasto en inferencia. El ahorro real depende de la carga y despliegue; costos de computación, hosting y servicio Aona siguen aplicando.

¿Cómo está diseñado Orbital para mejorar la precisión?

Structured identifiers need validation. Personal data needs recognition. Business policies need context. Orbital brings these different techniques into one security system. Aona evaluates both missed detections and false positives using labelled examples, hard negatives and held-out tests. For your policies, test separate allowed and disallowed requests on the intended Model, language and deployment. This is an engineering approach to accuracy, not a promise of perfect detection or a universal benchmark score.

¿Cómo se compara Orbital con otros modelos de seguridad?

Aona measures Orbital and the alternatives on the same held-out data. On 887 held-out policy prompts across 52 policies, Orbital 2.2.9 made 96.6% correct decisions, against 80.5% for Granite Guardian 3.1 2B and 76.3% for Llama Guard 3 1B, each given the same written policy. Hosted frontier models scored 96% to 99% but refused 20 to 30 of the prompts. On personal data, Radar and Lens raised 9 false alarms on 403 look-alike identifiers, against 96 for Microsoft Presidio and 242 for GLiNER-PII, and scored F1 0.936 on names, places and dates across 12 languages, against 0.271 and 0.605. Orbital was trained on Aona’s policy distribution with these prompts held out; the comparison models judged them zero-shot. Review the method notes, then evaluate your own workload.

¿Los resultados miden alucinaciones o ahorros de costes?

No. Policy accuracy measures reference flag-or-not-flag decisions. The separate false-alarm test measured personal-data detections on 240 ordinary business documents with no personal data: Orbital 2.2.9 flagged 1 (0.4%). That is not a general hallucination rate. No matched cost-per-request comparison is available here. Orbital avoids a separate general-purpose AI API call for its own inference; compute, hosting and Aona service costs still apply.

¿Orbital soporta comprobaciones deterministas y no deterministas?

Orbital supports deterministic rules and model-based checks. Use explicit patterns, term lists and checksum validation when the rule is precise; use learned recognition or Reflex when meaning and policy context matter. Model-based does not necessarily mean random: inference can be repeatable, but a learned verdict still needs evaluation. Configure the supported checks for your task; this is not a promise of automatic escalation whenever a model is uncertain.

¿Por qué Orbital puede costar menos en ejecución?

Orbital runs Aona’s own model inference instead of requiring a paid general-purpose AI API call for every Orbital check. Deterministic checks need no model inference; focused models handle recognition and policy context. This architecture is designed to reduce inference spend. Actual savings depend on the workload and deployment; compute, hosting and Aona service costs still apply. Deterministic-only operation avoids model inference, and selecting supported checks lets you avoid unnecessary model work. Compare total costs, including infrastructure and service costs, on representative request volumes; there is no universal savings percentage.

¿Cómo ayuda Orbital a evitar que datos sensibles lleguen a herramientas de IA?

Orbital puede identificar datos sensibles y evaluar solicitudes contra políticas configuradas. En una ruta cliente Aona soportada, esos hallazgos pueden informar redacciones o bloqueos. Para una integración API, tu aplicación debe aplicar el veredicto devuelto. Una comprobación de modelo sola no intercepta todas las solicitudes de IA.

¿Podemos usar nuestras propias políticas empresariales?

Yes. Aona supports customer-authored policy guardrails with policy instructions and labelled examples, answered by Reflex, plus Radar patterns and term lists. This configures the check; it is not per-customer model retraining. Use separate test requests to evaluate allowed and disallowed behaviour before activation, and confirm support in your deployment.

¿Orbital Edge significa que nuestros datos nunca salen del dispositivo?

For the check itself, yes. With Orbital Edge, Radar, Lens, Reflex and Vision run in a local agent on the employee’s machine, so the prompt is checked where it is typed and is not sent anywhere to be evaluated. Sensitive data is redacted or the request is blocked before it leaves the device. An allowed request then goes to the AI tool the employee chose, under your policy; confirm logging and telemetry settings for your deployment.

What changes between Orbital Edge y Orbital Cloud?

Where the check runs. Both run the same Radar, Lens, Reflex and Vision Submodels: Orbital Edge uses the employee’s machine, Orbital Cloud uses server infrastructure such as a T4 GPU. Model selection does not imply feature parity across clients or deployments.

¿Podemos ejecutar Orbital en nuestra nube o localmente?

Aona ofrece opciones separadas para alojamiento backend y procesamiento de prompts. El backend puede ejecutarse en tu nube, localmente o en servidores gestionados por Aona. El procesamiento de prompts puede ejecutarse en el dispositivo del usuario, en tu entorno o en servidores gestionados por Aona. Confirma el Modelo Orbital soportado, funciones y configuración de integración para tu despliegue.

¿Puede Orbital evaluar contenido de documentos además de prompts?

Orbital Files prepara texto de documentos soportados y rutas OCR para guardarraíles configurados. Es una canalización de procesamiento separada, no un Modelo Orbital. Vision inspecciona píxeles originales para regiones con forma de firma y sigue siendo solo en fase de pruebas, no disponible generalmente. Ni la detección de firmas ni un veredicto de política prueban identidad, consentimiento o cumplimiento. Confirma formatos de archivo, acceso a bytes originales y ruta de procesamiento.

¿Qué idiomas debemos evaluar?

The documented release-quality language scope is English, French and Spanish. In Aona’s held-out tests Orbital 2.2.9 scored 99.1% accuracy across 2,802 English, French and Spanish rows, caught 98.8% of non-English attacks, and found names, places and dates across 12 languages at F1 0.936. Other languages are best effort and need use-case-specific evaluation. Test real language patterns, document types and policy examples from your organisation; release-quality scope is not a guarantee of perfect results.

¿La clasificación de casos de uso cambia una decisión de seguridad?

No. Orbital’s use-case analytics describes the activity behind a request, such as research or email. It is separate from the configured guardrail verdict. The documented API integration is flag-gated staging, not generally available; confirm its availability for your deployment.

VE LA TECNOLOGÍA DE AONA EN TU TRABAJO

Tus requisitos de seguridad. Orbital debajo.

Lleva tus políticas, solicitudes de representantes e infraestructura preferida. Averigua qué comprobaciones encajan y luego evalúa la precisión y los requisitos operativos para tu implementación.