30 Days Gen AI Risk Trial -Start Now
Skip to main content
For LayerX evaluators

LayerX secures the whole browser.Aona governs AI use specifically.

LayerX is a broad enterprise browser-security platform: web and SaaS DLP, malicious-extension control, account and identity protection, plus GenAI DLP, delivered as a browser extension with a newer endpoint agent alongside it. Since 2 July 2026 it is part of Akamai, and Gartner lists it as Akamai Workforce Protector. Aona is narrower and deeper on one surface: workforce AI. It adds shadow-AI discovery, real-time coaching at the moment of a risky prompt, AI-specific DLP, and AI upskilling. Both operate at the browser layer, so the overlap on GenAI DLP is real. The question is whether you are buying broad browser security or focused AI governance.

LayerX

Enterprise browser-security platform delivered as a browser extension plus a newer endpoint agent, covering web and SaaS DLP, GenAI DLP, and malicious-extension control. Acquired by Akamai; Gartner now lists it as Akamai Workforce Protector.

Aona

The Workforce AI Security platform for any company adopting generative AI, with broader endpoint coverage than the incumbents, a simpler trial, and one of the few that ships hard-block DLP for AI prompts and files.

The verdict

Choose Aona if your mandate is workforce AI: shadow-AI discovery, real-time coaching, hard-block AI DLP with layout-preserving file redaction, native desktop AI app coverage LayerX's browser-led model does not document, 7-region data residency, and a 30-day self-serve trial. Choose LayerX, now listed by Gartner as Akamai Workforce Protector after Akamai completed its acquisition on 2 July 2026, only if your mandate is broad browser security: web and SaaS DLP, risky-extension control, phishing and identity protection. There is genuine GenAI DLP overlap, so match the tool to your primary mandate.

Jump to the decision matrix

SOC 2 Type II · 30-day free trial · No credit card · Live in 1 hour

Vendor facts last verified July 2026

Acquisition facts verified July 2026

What the Akamai acquisition changes

  • Akamai announced its intent to acquire LayerX on 15 May 2026 for approximately USD 205 million, and completed the acquisition on 2 July 2026.
  • Akamai has said LayerX advances its workforce security strategy with AI usage control and secure enterprise browser technology inside its zero trust portfolio.
  • As of July 2026, the Gartner listing renames the product Akamai Workforce Protector.
Questions worth asking before you commit
  • ?Will LayerX stay available standalone, or move into Akamai zero trust portfolio packaging and licensing at renewal?
  • ?What happens to support SLAs, your account team, and response times while the integration is underway?
  • ?How will the browser-security and GenAI DLP roadmap be prioritised inside Akamai's wider platform agenda?
Where Aona stands

Aona is independent and purpose-built for Workforce AI Security, with 7-region data residency (AU, FR, UK, DE, US, SG, HK) and a 30-day self-serve trial, so you can evaluate focused AI governance on your own terms while those questions get answered.

Decision matrix

When to pick which

Five scenarios. The honest answer for each one.

LayerX

Your mandate is broad browser security, not AI specifically.

LayerX covers web and SaaS DLP, malicious-extension control, phishing protection, and identity protection across the whole browser. Aona is scoped to workforce AI and does not cover those non-AI browser-security surfaces.

Aona

You need to evaluate this quarter with a self-serve trial and published pricing.

Aona offers a 30-day self-serve trial and published per-seat pricing. LayerX, now Akamai Workforce Protector, is demo-led with no published pricing or self-serve trial as of July 2026.

Aona

Your stack is Microsoft: Entra for identity, Intune for devices, Sentinel for the SIEM.

Aona is built for that stack: Entra SSO, Intune push for the Windows endpoint, and Microsoft Sentinel streaming via OCSF in production. LayerX documents broader IdP choice (Okta, Google Workspace), which matters only if you are not Entra-based.

Aona

Your priority is real-time AI coaching and shadow-AI discovery, not just blocking.

Aona is built around coaching employees at the moment of a risky AI prompt and discovering shadow AI across the workforce. LayerX's GenAI control is enforcement-first (monitor, warn, block) rather than a coaching and AI-upskilling program.

Aona

You need AI coverage in native desktop AI apps, not only the browser.

Aona ships a native endpoint app that intercepts desktop AI apps (ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude desktop) beyond the browser. LayerX added a newer endpoint agent alongside its extension, but its documented AI coverage remains browser-led.

Capability matrix

What each tool actually does

Three columns on the Aona side because the browser plugin and the native endpoint app cover different surfaces. Browser-only customers will see fewer green checks than customers with both.

CapabilityAona browser pluginAona native appLayerX
Discover
Shadow AI discovery across the workforceBrowser surfaceBrowser plus native AI appsMaps GenAI usage in-browser
Shadow SaaS / risky web app discoveryCore surface for LayerX
Native desktop AI app coverage (ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude desktop)Native endpoint app, beyond the browserEndpoint agent is newer; native AI-app interception not documented
AI agent / MCP visibilityLimited rollout: process, network, MCPMCP / agent-protocol depth not documented as of July 2026
Malicious / risky browser-extension controlInventory, scoring, blocking
Govern
Out-of-the-box AI framework templates (EU AI Act, ISO 42001)Policy engine, not AI-framework packs
Real-time employee coaching at the moment of a risky promptWarning messages with policy links
AI upskilling / employee enablement program
SSO / non-corporate-account enforcement for AI toolsEntra-based identity controlsEntra-based identity controlsEnforces SSO, blocks personal logins
Protect
GenAI prompt and file DLP in the browserReal-time monitor, warn, block
Web / SaaS DLP (uploads to personal Drive, websites)Core surface for LayerX
File redaction with layout preservation (DOCX / Excel)Length-matched entity replacementLength-matched entity replacementBlock uploads; redaction depth unclear
Operations
Identity / SSOEntra + OIDC/SAML, no Okta/SCIMEntra + OIDC/SAML, no Okta/SCIMEntra, Okta, Google Workspace
Deployment shapeBrowser pluginPlugin plus native endpoint appBrowser extension plus newer endpoint agent

Based on vendor documentation as of July 2026. Email trust@aona.ai if you find a factual error.

Deployment

What it takes to ship each one

Aona
Shape
Browser plugin (Chrome / Edge) and Windows native endpoint app, pushed via Microsoft Intune. macOS endpoint requires manual install today.
Time to first signal
Hours
What IT must change
One PowerShell command for Intune push. No SSO reconfiguration if already on Entra.
Prerequisites
  • Microsoft Intune (Windows MDM, only path shipped)
  • Microsoft Entra (admin SSO + user/group sync)
LayerX
Shape
A browser extension installed across Chrome, Edge, Safari, and Firefox, pushed via Group Policy or MDM, plus a newer endpoint agent. In-browser ML engine; only risk alerts go to the cloud console.
Time to first signal
Hours
What IT must change
Extension push via existing device management. Integrates with your identity provider; no network rerouting.
Prerequisites
  • Device management for managed devices (Group Policy / MDM)
  • Identity provider for SSO enforcement (Entra, Okta, Google Workspace)
Honest weaknesses

Where each one falls short

From public docs and customer interviews. If you find a factual error, email trust@aona.ai.

Where Aona is weaker
  • No general web or SaaS DLP. LayerX covers uploads to personal Drive, Gmail, and external sites; Aona does not.
  • No malicious-extension or phishing protection. LayerX governs the whole browser attack surface; Aona is scoped to AI.
  • No native Okta or SCIM. Microsoft Entra is the production path plus general OIDC/SAML; LayerX ships native Okta and Google Workspace integrations.
  • Browser extension covers only the browser; native desktop AI app coverage is a limited rollout, not GA.
  • No FedRAMP or IRAP today. Aona holds SOC 2 Type II only as of July 2026.
Where LayerX is weaker
  • No out-of-the-box AI governance framework templates (EU AI Act, ISO 42001).
  • GenAI control is enforcement-first (monitor, warn, block), not a real-time coaching and AI-upskilling program.
  • Endpoint agent is newer; documented AI coverage remains browser-led, and MCP / agent-protocol depth is thin.
  • Broad browser-security scope can over-spec a buyer whose only problem is workforce AI governance.
Security review facts

What your security review will ask

Certifications, pricing reality, data handling, and residency for both vendors, answered up front so your GRC and legal review can start from this page.

AonaLayerX
CertificationsSOC 2 Type II (audit window ended February 2026). No FedRAMP or IRAP today.Not publicly documented (as of July 2026)
Pricing and trialPublished pricing: Business plan $9.99 per user per month, Enterprise custom. 30-day self-serve free trial, no credit card. As of July 2026.No public pricing and no self-serve trial. Quotes are sales-led, now through Akamai. As of July 2026.
Where prompts are processedPrompt content is processed server-side by the Aona API in your chosen region. Retention configurable: 30, 90, or 180 days.LayerX documents an in-browser analysis engine, with risk alerts sent to its cloud console. Full processing locations are not publicly documented (as of July 2026).
Data residency7 live regions: Australia, France, UK, Germany, US, Singapore, Hong Kong. Prompts, files, and audit logs stay in-region.Not publicly documented (as of July 2026)
DPA and security docsDPA available on request. Security overview at aona.ai/security. SOC 2 report under NDA.Not publicly documented (as of July 2026)

Competitor facts come from public documentation and pricing pages. Where a vendor does not publish a fact, we say so rather than guess. Corrections: trust@aona.ai.

Migration

Migrating from LayerX

If your only problem is workforce AI usage, Aona is the more focused fit and ships AI governance, coaching, and upskilling LayerX does not. If you also need broad browser security (web and SaaS DLP, extension control, identity protection), LayerX covers surfaces Aona does not, and running both on the same browser is the wrong move. Pick the platform that matches your primary mandate; only layer if the AI-governance gap is the deciding factor and you accept duplicate GenAI DLP.

What you keep
  • Existing identity provider and MDM (Entra / Intune)
  • LayerX for broad browser security, if web/SaaS DLP and extension control matter to you
  • Existing browser estate; both deploy as a browser-layer install
What Aona replaces
  • LayerX's GenAI DLP module, for orgs whose only AI problem is workforce usage
  • Enforcement-only AI control, replaced by coaching plus AI upskilling
  • Generic warning messages, replaced by AI-framework-aligned governance templates
What you turn off
  • Duplicate GenAI DLP enforcement on the same browser
  • Overlapping AI-usage policies once a single owner is chosen
Get started

See focused AI governance next to broad browser security

30-day free trial. Deploys via Intune and Entra in under an hour. Shadow-AI discovery, real-time coaching, AI DLP, and upskilling, purpose-built for workforce AI.

FAQ

Common questions from LayerX customers

It depends on your mandate. For workforce AI governance specifically (shadow-AI discovery, coaching, AI DLP, upskilling), Aona is a focused alternative and usually the cleaner fit. For broad browser security (web and SaaS DLP, malicious-extension control, identity and phishing protection), LayerX covers surfaces Aona does not. Because both do GenAI DLP at the browser, running them together means duplicate AI enforcement, so most buyers choose the one matching their primary mandate rather than layering.